Posts Tagged ‘English language’

Words are Supercalifragilisticexpialidocious

Wednesday, January 6th, 2010

Isn’t the English language “supercalifragilisticexpialidocious”.  That 34 letter word, sung so handsomely by Julie Andrews and Dick Van Dyke in the movie Mary Poppins, means wonderful.  It is the longest non-medical, non-technical, non-foreign word in the English language.  Did you get all that?

Well, that is unless you consider it not really a word, since it was made up by the two brothers who wrote the song for the Disney movie.  In that case, the longest word is “antidisestablishmentarianism”, at 28 letters.  Can’t you remember back in the 1950s or ’60s being so smug because as an eight year old you knew the longest word in the English language?  That tongue twister originally meant, basically, opposition to the proposal to disestablish the Church of England.  Yikes.  Not to be outdone, some folks have added “pseudo” to the beginning of the word to stretch it to 34 letters.

In the category of English place names, there’s an 85 letter word for a certain hill in New Zealand.  I won’t bother typing it.  The two longest words in the entire English language are, well, a bit extreme.  There’s a 189,819 letter word that is the chemical name for a protein.  And the overall winner is the 280,000 word name for DNA, that molecular structure that embodies life.  The word is so long that it reportedly has never been written.  Duh.

We certainly have come a long way from the days when cavemen pointed and probably said, “Ugh”. 

The evolution of our civilization is directly tied to the evolution of our sophisticated language.  As communication became more effective, humans could interact better and progress was made.  Of course, earth still had to endure millenia of slavery, savagery, and wars, but in the end things got better because we became better communicators.  Ideas were able to be passed from one generation to the next, with each generation improving on the past.  Socrates taught Plato, who taught Aristotle, who taught Alexander the Great, and so on.  Later on, Leonardo da Vinci was followed by Copernicus, who was followed by Galileo.  Continuing the procession of ideas and thought, Darwin was followed by Einstein, blah, blah, blah.  You get the picture.

Without the continuing upgrading of language for the past 30,000 years, where would we be today?  Schools wouldn’t exist, teachers wouldn’t teach, there would be no books, no pencils, no computers.  We’d still be hunter-gatherers, living in small clans and wandering the land.  Life would be eat or be eaten, stay warm or perish.

So as you read this, contemplate the 600 generations that improved communication.  We exist as we do because the human spirit strived to be better.

- Mountain Man and City Girl

http://www.MountainManandCityGirl.com

The Demise of “da inglish langwij”

Thursday, December 31st, 2009

Maybe it’s me.  But I’m really amazed at how the majority of the American public has no sense of correct spelling and grammar.

Since you are reading this blog instead of sitting home on the couch watching Jerry Springer or hanging out in an alley sipping some Boone’s Farm Apple Wine and puffing on a cigarette, you are also probably confounded by how the English language is being butchered.

As a realtor, I am actually getting used to the fact that so many people spell realty as R-E-A-L-I-T-Y.  Duh!  Isn’t reality one of those dumb shows where people eat maggots or get stranded together on an island?

And how about people who say, “I ain’t got none.”  Gee, I didn’t learn not to use double negatives until I was in the fourth grade.  Or was it sooner? (Did you notice my use of a double negative?)

I guess our educational systems are to blame.  Teachers become babysitters to half the kids, while the other half actually learn and excel.  I was always in the “accelerated” class growing up in progressive North Jersey, so I was separated from the dummies after kindergarten and apparently forgot they existed.  Perhaps that’s why I’m perplexed by their lack of English fundamentals.

Yet, you would think that after 10 or 12 years of school people would have retained some elements of grammar and spelling.  Some people come from the worst possible environment or home life, but somehow they work hard and get college degrees and end up with high-paying jobs.  They show that anyone can excel.

So how come some people can’t even fill out a job application or handle a job interview?  The answer may be that they concentrated on being “cool” when they were in school, instead of toeing the line.  I guess that once again lays the blame on the schools.

I’m not sure what the solution is.  More compassion from teachers, smaller classrooms, more individual attention?  Maybe more direction from parents, but if they’re half-literate that’ll be tough.

Maybe we better just play taps for the English language and bury it with honors.

- Mountain Man and City Girl

http://www.MountainManandCityGirl.com