Posts Tagged ‘Cape May Court House real estate’

Baby Boomers will be replaced

Saturday, December 12th, 2009

Most people would agree that the real estate market of the last 15 or 20 years has been fueled by the Baby Boomers.  As you know, that’s the 80 million Americans born between 1946 and 1964, and now ages 45 to 63 years old.  They’ve had careers and saved money and invested in real estate, stocks, and retirement plans, amongst other things.

The next generation has been called “Generation X”, originally called the “Baby Bust” due to the low birthrate in America.  They were born from 1965 to 1979, with the latter half mostly children of early Baby Boomers.  They are now 30 to 44 years old, but they are just 48 million strong.  With the average age of a first-time homebuyer pegged about 33 years old, they are filling that niche right now while the Baby Boomers upgrade to add vacation homes or downsize to smaller homes as “empty nesters”.

The next group to arrive was Generation Y, those born between 1980 and 1995.  Now 14 to 29 years olds and children of the latter half of the Baby Boomers and the early Gen X’ers, they will be the next group to arrive on the real estate scene.  The exciting news for the real estate industry and the economy of the United States in general is that there are 74 million of them.  They should eventually have the economic impact equal to that of the Baby Boomers.  Tattoos and piercings and all, this generation will soon enter the first-time homebuyer market and take their place on the economic ladder until they are perhaps 60 years old or so.

As the population demographics shift from one group to another, there will always be a new generation to carry the day.  Isn’t that why we reproduce?

- Mountain Man

http://www.MountainManandCityGirl.com

A Real Jump-Start

Friday, December 11th, 2009

Nearly a year into the Obama administration I think Americans can see that the No.1 issue in the nation’s mind – the economy – is still sputtering.  Bank bailouts and all that stuff just aren’t working fast enough.

As Mighty Mouse used to say, “Here I come to save the day!”  So here’s my simplistic approach to ending the Recession.

The United States of America has the highest bond rating possible – AAA.  That rating means that the U.S. is not likely to default on debt.  Thanks to the Bretton Woods Accord back in the 1970s, the U.S. dollar is no longer backed by the gold in Fort Knox.  The American dollar – of which there are 829 billion – is backed by the government’s ability to generate revenue to pay down it’s debt.

New dollars are issued when the Federal Reserve elects to fund the purchase of debt, which is usually through U.S. Treasury Bonds.  Done in excess, this can cause inflation, but bear with me.

The net worth of Americans is currently $53.4 trillion.  Prior to the Recession, it was $64.5 trillion.  In other words, we’ve lost 17.2% of our worth.  By the way, $348 billion of our collective $53.4 trillion is household real estate holdings, i.e. your house.

That’s the background, now my proposal.

Let’s give each American household $10,000 tax free.  With 105,480,101 households, that’s $1.05 trillion.

There are 7.7 million businesses in America.  Let’s give them each $100,000 tax free.  That’s a mere $770 billion. 

So add it up and the American government can print and distribute $1.82 trillion.  This isn’t money raised by taxes.  We’re just gonna print it and give it out.  There’s just one stipulation – the money can’t leave the country.  It can’t be sent to relatives in Nicaragua or used to hire workers in China.  It has to be spent in the 50 states.

Think of the ramifications.  The boost to the economy will be incredible.  Some people will pay down debt or save their homes, while others will buy TVs, cars, and yes, useless junk.  Some might even use some of the money for booze, cigarettes, and methamphetimines, but that can’t be helped.

All this will turn into many of the 7 million people laid off from work since the beginning of the Recession getting gainful employment again.  For every dollar currently in circulation, there will now be three dollars.  Banks will start lending again and the good times will roll.  States will see an increase in sales taxes collected, easing their budget pains.

The nay-sayers will yell that my plan will cause inflation.  Sure, it will.  But it’ll be manageable, maybe 10% at most and it will be a one-time thing, just like my giveaway windfall.  But the trade-off of jobs and reduced personal debt is well worth it.  The American economy will have the jump-start it needs.

Some might call my plan crazy.  But at least I have a plan.

And I bet you’re smiling and already thinking about how you’d spend your $10,000. 

- Mountain Man

http://www.MountainManandCityGirl.com

Wildwood recall successful

Thursday, December 10th, 2009

“Surprise, Surprise, Surprise”, as Gomer Pyle used to say. 

To the surprise of many, including this ardent Cape May County observer, voters successfully recalled City of Wildwood Mayor Ernie Troiano and Commissioner Bill Davenport in Tuesday’s special election. 

The first part of the ballot asked whether voters wanted to recall the pair.  Voters went 624 to 487 to recall the mayor and 649 to 470 to unseat the commissioner.  Apparently there was enough dissent within the community to overcome the regular party machine.

The second part of the ballot then asked to vote for two of the six candidates.  With only about a dozen or so provisional ballots not yet counted, the vote went:

Ed Harshaw 600, Al Brannen 577, Troiano 496, Davenport 453, Ernesto Salvatico 45, and John Roat 42.

And so Harshaw, a real likable high school history teacher, and Brannen, who’s been a thorn in the administration’s side, take over a city with the highest tax rate in Cape May County and a mountain of debt.  They join Commissioner Gary DeMarzo, the controversial third commissioner.

The trio will decide amongst themselves who will be mayor and they haven’t hinted publicly yet whom they each will vote for. 

The outgoing mayor took a parting shot, not indicating whether or not he knows exactly who will be the new mayor.  “The only thing that bothers me is you’ll have an absolute nitwit for a mayor now.”

- Mountain Man

http://www.MountainManandCityGirl.com

Bank of America isn’t

Thursday, December 10th, 2009

If you have credit cards – and who doesn’t? – you probably got a notice in the last few days from Bank of America.  The letter said that your credit line has been reduced to a few hundred dollars.  The tens of thousands of dollars of available credit or cash you had the week before is suddenly gone!  Merry Christmas.

Chase Bank and Bank of America, which merged with Merrill Lynch in 2009, pretty much have the credit card business all to themselves.  These two giants of the financial world control the credit destiny of tens of millions of Americans.

So why would Bank of America suddenly cut off five or ten million hard-working American families from having credit lines?

 

This past Tuesday, December 8, Bank of America paid back the $45 billion it got from the U.S. Government in the big bank bailout.  It did it with about $19 billion in cash and the balance by selling off securities.  To make sure they had the cash on hand, B of A apparently needed to make sure you couldn’t borrow any of it.

Here comes the kicker.

Bank of America paid back the $45 billion to the U.S. Treasury so that they would no longer be bound by the rules that were instituted as a condition of using the bailout funds.  Since the CEO of B of A recently announced his resignation as of December 31, the board of directors has been searching for a new CEO.  It seems they feel that they can’t offer “proper incentives” to attract a quality CEO and accepting the government grant money limited the bonuses allowed to be paid to the company’s top management.

So, to make sure they can offer their new CEO $50 million or $100 million in bonus incentives, they cut off the credit of millions of American families! 

Where’s the public outrage?

- Mountain Man

A Real Person on the Phone

Tuesday, December 8th, 2009

I read a Letter to the Editor in today’s Press of Atlantic City that addressed one of my many pet peeves – not getting a real, live person on the phone when you call a business.

Isn’t it annoying?  Especially when you know there’s a bunch of slackers sitting there probably drinking coffee and eating doughnuts and listening to the phone ring.

Automated answering systems are impersonal and make you feel like your business is not appreciated.  As the Press letter states, the worst scenario is when your first prompt is “Press 1 for English”.  Arrrgh!

And this all brings me to mention Jewell Real Estate Agency.  We don’t have an automated system.  We ALWAYS have a live person answer the phone.  I’m not talking just during business hours, but 6am to 9pm every single day of the year.  That’s 15 hours a day that one of us is there to actually take the receiver off the hook and say, “Good morning (or afternoon or evening), Jewell Real Estate Agency, Joyce (or Chris or Douglas or ….) speaking”. 

We will NEVER, NEVER, EVER have an automated system.  You’ll never hear “Choose from the following menu options” or “If you know your party’s extension, dial it now”.  It upsets me just thinking about the idiot companies that do this.

In this fast-paced world, isn’t it nice to know that somewhere out there you can speak to a real live person.  If you ever call 609-729-8505 or 609-463-8423 and you get an automated system with extension options, then guess what?  You missed my funeral!

- Mountain Man

Political Speak

Tuesday, December 8th, 2009

In the October 2009 issue of New Jersey Realtor, the magazine did a typical pre-election article asking the governor candidates – incumbent Jon Corzine and challenger (now Governor-elect) Chris Christie – a series of position questions.

Their answers were mostly, well, carefully worded non-answers or non-commitals.

The first question asked was, ”what steps will you take to reform our property tax system?”

Gov Corzine gave a long-winded eight paragraph account of his accomplishments in office, but sidestepped the actual question.  Christie gave a better answer, but limited his solution to “a smaller, leaner, more efficient government” and that he would keep the property tax rebate in place.

The second question dealt with repealing the Realty Transfer Fee, which averages $2,958 for each transaction.

Christie called it “one of the best examples of a tax that was imposed to capitalize on a booming real estate market that has now proven to be incredibly damaging”.  Good answer, but he stopped short of proclaiming he’d repeal it.  Corzine again completely avoided directly addressing the question.

The next question asked, “Do you support efforts to partially eliminate the property tax deduction?” and would they support “imposing a sales tax on rentals or professional services?”

Corzine basically said, “Leadership is about making difficult choices” and “I cannot guess what actions we will be required to take”.  Typical incumbent evasiveness!  Christie did step up by saying, “I do not support either the further elimination of the property tax deduction or expansion of the sales tax or any other tax.”  He stopped short of saying he’d veto such attempts.

The fourth question was “What actions will you take to encourage stabilization and growth of the real estate market?”

Christie spoke of “restoring the vitality of our cities” and “an elimination of the outrageous quotas and requirements of the Council on Affordable Housing (COAH)”.  Good answers, but they don’t really address stabilization and growth.  Corzine talked about business development and his Economic Stimulus Act of 2009, but it fell short of being reassuring.

The final query was concerning the government’s right of eminent domain, especially seizing a person’s property and giving to another private property owner for redevelopment purposes.

Both candidates gave “feel good” two sentence answers, but no concrete proposals.  Hmmm.

I must admit that I voted for neither of these candidates but instead voted for an alternative choice, which pollsters interpret as a dissenting vote.  I guess I’m becoming increasingly disenfranchised from the system.  Can you blame me? 

Governor-elect Christie has inherited a giant pile of chicken manure.  Let’s see if he can turn it into chicken salad.

- Mountain Man

Feeding at the Public Trough

Monday, December 7th, 2009

While most folks are struggling to make ends meet in this depressed economy, New Jersey government and municipal retirees are cleaning up.  In fact, 428 retirees pull in over $100,000 per year in pension money.

In 2008, the median pension in New Jersey was $61,800 for police and fire retirees, $81,700 for State Police, and $43,200 for teachers.  These figures are more than the salary – yes, salary – of the average New Jersey worker, which is $37,900.

In a state with an $8 billion budget deficit this year, the $5.7 billion in pensions is an unfair drain on taxpayers.  To add insult to injury, the state and many municipal governments have failed to keep up with fully funding these pension funds, meaning the public will get increasingly larger bills each year.

So what to do?

Obviously, the system needs to be changed.  The thought that a fireman or policeman can work from age 21 to 46 and collect substantial sums of pension money after this 25 years, then start a second career, is unconscienable.  Newly hired state employees, who could retire at age 55 as of 2001, have seen outgoing Governor Corzine increase that back to age 60.

It appears that legislators are fearful of reigning in the money grab by retirees.  So taxpayers will continue to fund this act of greed through real estate taxes, which are already the highest in the United States.

There is one group that won’t be funding the pension through real estate taxes.  Did I mention that one-third of these pensioners have moved out of New Jersey?

- Mountain Man

Lower Township tax assessment

Saturday, December 5th, 2009

Lower Township, which includes such areas as Diamond Beach, North Cape May, and Villas, has decided to do an in-house reassessment of properties.  No, not to increase the value of properties, but to lower them.

It seems that when Lower did its last assessment in 2007, the implications of this recession were not fully evident.  But now three years of a down market in real estate have seen these assessments appear to be 20% or more too high.

That 2007 assessment tripled the township’s ratables from the 1992 figure of $1.5 billion to over $4.5 million.  The new reassessment will be done by the municipal tax department, meaning there will be no on-site inspections.  It’s strictly a numbers crunch.  It also means that the cost will be just $25,000, instead of the million dollars for a full-blown reassessment by an outside company.

Properties expected to see the biggest drop in values are those near the water, i.e. the Delaware Bay and Atlantic Ocean.  Hopefully Diamond Beach owners, who have historically been a cash cow for Lower despite fewer services and no fire station, will get a fair shake this time around.

Speaking of Diamond Beach, the new Grand condominium complex, located beachfront on Atlantic Avenue, was originally touted by developers and officials as bringing as much as $6 million in new property tax revenue to Lower Township.  With one of three buildings completed, just $400,000 is being added to the coffers this year. 

The Grand may someday make a big difference in the tax rate, but for now, with Lower this year paying an extra $289,000 in pensions plus a 3.7 % salary increase to municipal employees, that $400,000 from the Grand property taxes has been negated.

Seems like no matter what townships throughout New Jersey do to lower their budgets, the greedy, whiny employees – current and retired – milk the taxpayer far beyond the limits of reason.  That, sadly, will never change in our current political climate of patronage and deal-making.

- Mountain Man

Recreation Subsidies

Monday, November 30th, 2009

When the recent “Veterans Day Storm” slammed the east coast November 11-15, some Cape May County island homeowners suffered water damage and wind damage to their properties.  For most, it was business as usual and they cleaned up the mess and moved on.  It’s life at the shore for those in the few scattered low-lying streets in Wildwood, North Wildwood, and West Wildwood.

The beaches are another story.  So that local governments could score Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) money, New Jersey Governor Corzine obligingly declared a state of emergency.  The damage to Cape May County, originally ballparked at $89 million, was determined to actually be $27.3 million.  Those beach erosion figures are based on $10.40 per cubic yard of sand to be replaced.  Sand for dunes is calculated up to $20 per cubic yard.

The bigger question here is whether the U.S. government should be subsidizing beaches.  Is it fair to someone living in Iowa to pay for beaches in Avalon rimmed with $4 million vacation homes?

What would homeowners who cry for FEMA beach funds in their communities think if the federal government started funding ski resorts?  Heck, they want snow by Thanksgiving to have a good year.  Should we be subsidizing snowmaking operations at the hundreds of ski slopes throughout the U.S.?  Let’s take it a step further and put refrigeration lines under each ski slope.  That’ll make the millions of American skiers happy.

While we’re at it, why not have FEMA subsidize all the golf courses in America?  In a drought, ship in tanker trucks of fresh water from the Great Lakes and major rivers.  That would please the 24 million Americans who play golf.  They want lush green golf courses, not those spotted with burned out patches of grass.

Do you see my point?

With oceans rising as the Arctic, Greenland, and Antarctic melt, the beach erosion problem has intensified.  Many local shore towns will be doing two beach replenishment projects this year.  Ten years from now, it may necessitate three or four a year, which isn’t going to happen.  FEMA will finally say, “No Mas”.

So it’s time to be proactive.

Where beaches habitually wash out in storms, it is time to rip rap with massive walls of boulders, much like the seawalls recently constructed at the north end of both North Wildwood and Avalon at the inlets.  FEMA should offer to pay for the rip rapping of the ocean.  Sure it means less beaches, but once the seawalls are built, the beaches will come and go.  After all, beaches are always in transit.  It’s just in the last 100 years that civilization decided they’d try to tame Mother Nature.

There will always be plenty of beaches in Cape May County, but people will have to search them out.  Here today, gone tomorrow, but another beach pops up a mile away.  And certain beaches, like Wildwood, which is over 1,000 feet in depth, will always be there.

Like it or not, the days of FEMA beach handouts are numbered.  As they should be.

- Mountain Man

Tax Credits for Homebuyers

Monday, November 30th, 2009

The popular homebuyer tax credit program, which was due to expire November 30, 2009, has been extended to April 30, 2010.  Adding to the good news is the fact that it is no longer confined to just first-time homebuyers.

The rules are that the first-time homebuyer can not have had interest in a principal residence for three years prior to the purchase.  A current homeowner must have used their existing home as a principal residence for five of the previous eight years.  The first-timer gets an $8,000 credit ($4,000 if married filing separately), while the existing homebuyer gets a $6,500 credit ($3,250 if married filing separately).

All other provisions of the Tax Credit are the same for both first-time homebuyers and current owners.

The prospective property must be put “under contract” before May 1, 2010 and the transfer must take place by July 1, 2010.  The income limits are $125,000 for a single person and $225,000 for a married couple (up from $75,000 and $150,000) for a full tax credit.  A partial tax credit is given for $125,000 to $145,000 for singles and $225,000 to $245,000 for married couples.  Above those incomes is no tax credit.

The maximum price of the property being purchased is $800,000.  The property transfer can not be between dependents (parents and child or grandchild) and documentation of the purchase must be attached to the tax return.  Parents can still, however, co-sign on the mortgage and the child gets the tax credit.

All in all, the homebuyer tax credit is a good deal.  If only it was permanent.

- Mountain Man

Hello world!

Monday, January 14th, 2008

Welcome to our Mountain Man and City Girl blog.  We hope you enjoy our various posts and feel compelled to post comments.  Some of our posts are about the real estate industry, some about life in general.  Some are thought provoking, while others are lighthearted, feel good tidbits.

Some of the many pictures you see were taken by us.  Most are from clip art programs that we purchased or available free on the internet.  All the pictures are used to enhance our stories.  We trust you’ll enjoy our blogsite.

To see the business side of us, visit our websites at http://www.JewellRealEstateAgency.com  or http://totempolesandwaterfalls.com

- Mountain Man